Ez60 Ez63 Review: Real User Experience After 3 Months

I've been using the Ez60 and Ez63 true wireless earbuds for about three months now, rotating them depending on what I was doing that day. I bought both to see how much difference there is between two models from the same line and to find out which one would actually fit my daily needs—commuting, working from home, phone calls, and the occasional gaming session. What follows is my honest, hands-on account: the things I loved, the annoyances that crept up, and the practical differences that matter when you live with a pair of earbuds every day.

Why I bought both (short context)

I wanted a realistic comparison. The Ez60 is marketed as the all-rounder and the Ez63 as the slightly upgraded sibling with extra features. In my experience, buying two similar models and using them side-by-side is the fastest way to see which compromise matters to you—battery life, ANC, comfort, or call clarity. I primarily use earbuds for background music while I work, conference calls, and during my daily runs. I also game on my phone sometimes, so latency and comfortable fit are non-negotiable for me.

First impressions and unboxing

Out of the box, both pairs felt well-packaged and included a decent selection of silicone tips (small, medium, large). The cases are compact enough for a pants pocket, but the Ez63 case is visibly heavier—more weight, but also a more reassuring hinge and finish. I noticed tiny manufacturing differences right away: the Ez60 case has a matte finish that picks up fingerprints less, while the Ez63's slight gloss shows smudges but looks sleeker.

Design and build quality

In my hands, neither model felt fragile. The EZ60's plastic is slightly thinner to the touch, whereas the Ez63 uses denser materials and has a little metal accent on the stem that makes it feel more premium. Both earbuds are mostly plastic with rubberized ear tips. After three months of daily use, I have a couple of faint scuff marks on the Ez60 case near where it rubs against keys when I forget to take it out—nothing structural, just cosmetic. The Ez63's hinge has held up perfectly, and the heavier lid feels less likely to accidentally pop open in my bag.

Comfort and fit

Comfort was one of the first things I tested. The silicone tips that came in the box worked well for me most of the time, but I did swap to third-party foam tips for longer listening sessions because they sealed better and made the bass feel tighter. When I run, the Ez63 stayed put better than the Ez60; the Ez60 occasionally shifted on longer, sweaty runs, which annoyed me. I noticed that the Ez60's stem design is slightly shorter, so people with smaller ears might actually find them less intrusive, while I prefer the Ez63 for all-day wear because its shape distributes pressure more evenly in my ear canal.

Sound quality: what I heard

Sound is subjective, but here’s what I found after listening to a variety of music and podcasts. The Ez60 has a slightly V-shaped tuning—bass and treble are emphasized. That made pop and electronic music fun, but some vocals felt pushed back. The Ez63, on the other hand, felt more balanced to my ears: tighter bass, clearer mids, and less harsh treble. Acoustic tracks and podcasts sounded more natural on the Ez63.

Both earbuds let you tweak the sound via the companion app (more on the app below). With a little EQ adjustment, I could get the Ez60 to sound closer to the Ez63, but the default tuning is an important factor if you don't plan to dig into settings.

Soundstage and detail

Neither of these earbuds will fool you into thinking you’re in a concert hall, but the Ez63 gives a slightly wider soundstage and better separation between instruments. I was surprised by how much detail the Ez63 retained at lower volumes—the strings in classical pieces and the breathiness of vocals came through nicely. The Ez60 was energetic but less nuanced.

Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and transparency

Both models offer ANC, and this is where the practical difference shows up most days. In my experience:

• The Ez63's ANC noticeably reduces low-frequency noise—train rumble and air conditioning hum. It doesn't remove everything, but it makes long commutes less tiring.
• The Ez60's ANC works, but it’s less effective for constant low-frequency sounds and can sometimes introduce a faint electronic hiss at quiet moments.

I also tested transparency/ambient mode while walking outside. The Ez63's transparency mode felt more natural and less processed—voices from people around me sounded clearer. With the Ez60, transparency mode made things louder but slightly distorted at times, which made me hesitant to rely on it for street awareness.

Battery life and charging behavior

Battery life is where the numbers mattered in real life. My measured averages after three months of usual use were:

• Ez60: Around 6–7 hours per charge with ANC off, closer to 5–5.5 hours with ANC on.
• Ez63: Around 8–9 hours pe…

  Connectivity, app, and features

  Both earbuds connected quickly to my phone and remembered devices without a problem. I tested them with two phones and my laptop. The companion app is where the Ez63 shines: it offered an intuitive EQ, firmware updates, ANC level control, and a lower-latency "game mode." The Ez60's app had fewer customization options and was slower to receive firmware updates during my testing.

  Multipoint connectivity (connected to two devices at once) worked intermittently for me on both models. The Ez63 handled switching between my phone and laptop more gracefully, but I did occasionally have to toggle Bluetooth to get the audio to jump devices. Range is typical—about 8–10 meters unobstructed before the music stuttered.

  Latency and gaming

  I played a few casual mobile games and tested video playback for lip-sync. With standard mode, both earbuds had noticeable latency if you’re a competitive gamer, and dialog could lag slightly behind video. The Ez63's game mode reduced latency enough that casual gaming and watching videos felt fine. If you’re into competitive FPS on mobile, expect some delay; earbuds in this price class rarely eliminate latency completely.

  Call quality and microphone performance

  For calls, I primarily used the earbuds for conference calls and phone calls while walking. In quiet rooms, both performed well enough—voices came through clear to my listeners. Outside, wind was the biggest problem. The Ez63's mic system handled moderate wind better than the Ez60, but both struggled in strong gusts; callers sometimes told me there was a low-frequency rumble or that my voice sounded slightly muffled. If regular outdoor calls are a must, consider an external mic or a headset specifically designed for windy conditions.

  Discover deals on Electronics — updated daily.

  Shop Amazon →

  Durability after three months

  Three months of daily use is a short time in the lifespan of a gadget, but it’s long enough to reveal weak spots. The Ez60 showed some paint wear and a little looseness in the case after being tossed in my bag with keys a few times. The Ez63 survived that abuse with only cosmetic scuffs on the case; the earbuds themselves remained nearly pristine, and the battery still held up well without noticeable capacity drop. I didn't expose them to heavy water, but light sweat during workouts caused no issues. The Ez63 feels more robust over time.

  Pros & Cons

  • Pros (Ez60):
    • Fun, energetic sound signature out of the box
    • Lightweight and comfortable for short sessions
    • Affordable-sounding compared to feature set
  • Cons (Ez60):
    • Weaker ANC compared with Ez63
    • Less durable case and cosmetic wear after daily carry
    • App and firmware support felt limited
  • Pros (Ez63):
    • More balanced, detailed sound
    • Stronger ANC and more natural transparency
    • Better battery life and faster charging
    • Companion app with more useful options (EQ, updates, game mode)
  • Cons (Ez63):
    • Heavier case—slightly bulkier in a pocket
    • Not completely immune to wind noise on calls
    • Multipoint works but can be flaky occasionally

  Ez60 vs Ez63 — quick comparison

  Category	Ez60	Ez63
  Design & build	Lightweight, matte finish, shows wear faster	Denser build, sleeker finish, stronger hinge
  Sound	V-shaped, punchy bass, brighter treble	Balanced, clearer mids, more detail
  ANC	Decent for casual use, some hiss	Better at low-frequency suppression, smoother transparency
  Battery	~6–7 hrs per charge (ANC off)	~8–9 hrs per charge (ANC off) + faster top-up
  Comfort & fit	Comfortable short-term, can shift during runs	More secure fit for longer wear and exercise
  App & features	Basic app, limited customization	Full-featured app: EQ, game mode, firmware updates
  Best for	Casual listeners and short sessions	All-day use, commuting, and users who want better ANC and battery

  Buying guide — how to decide

  If you're deciding between the Ez60, Ez63, or similar earbuds, ask yourself what you actually need from earbuds in daily life. Here are the questions I asked myself and what I learned:

  • Do I need long battery life? If you regularly spend long hours away from a charger, prioritize the Ez63. I found it lasted through more workdays between charges and the case recharges more times.
  • How important is ANC? For noisy commutes, the Ez63's ANC made a real difference. The Ez60 reduced background noise but not as effectively.
  • Will I use them for calls outdoors? Neither model is perfect in heavy wind. If outdoor calling is a daily need, test call quality in a busy environment or look for a device with specialized wind-reduction features.
  • Do I want an app with customization? The Ez63's app is meaningfully better for EQ and firmware updates. If you like tuning your sound, that matters.
  • How important is durability? I carry my earbuds in the same pocket as my keys sometimes; the Ez63 was more rugged. If you treat your gear roughly, go with the sturdier model.

  Practical tips before buying: try multiple ear tip sizes for the right seal, test transparency mode if you plan to use them outdoors, and check the return policy—small comfort differences can make or break daily wearability. Also keep an eye on firmware updates right after purchase; I got an improvement to ANC behavior on the Ez63 within the first month that made a noticeable difference.

  Final thoughts and conclusion

  After three months with both, I reached a clear personal conclusion: the Ez63 is the better daily driver for my use. It handled commutes, calls, and long listening sessions with fewer complaints. I noticed the improved ANC and battery immediately, and the app made it easy to fine-tune sound. The Ez60 is still a capable pair of earbuds if you prefer a lighter weight and a punchy sound right out of the box, but I found myself reaching for the Ez63 more often.

  One thing that bothered me across both models was wind handling on calls—if you frequently take calls outdoors in blustery conditions, plan around that limitation. I was pleasantly surprised by the Ez63’s battery longevity and comfort during full workdays; its improvements were tangible in everyday life, not just on spec sheets.

  

  In my experience, these earbuds are a good example of how small differences—build, tuning, app polish—add up to a noticeably different ownership experience. If you value balance, reliable ANC, and longer battery life, the Ez63 is what I'd recommend based on my three months of use. If you want something lighter with a lively sound and you don't need top-tier noise cancellation, the Ez60 can still be a satisfying pick.